|
Post by pub146g on Oct 20, 2012 13:37:50 GMT 1
36195 now has route branding for service 42. Saw it parked up not in service in leeds bus station. Also 36192-194, all in service with Mauve 42 branding.
|
|
|
Post by rst1987 on Oct 20, 2012 13:51:42 GMT 1
36195 now has route branding for service 42. Saw it parked up not in service in leeds bus station. Also 36192-194, all in service with Mauve 42 branding. Yep, pic of 36192 with 42 branding on Ukbus Photos' facebook wall.
|
|
SF07
Forum Member
Posts: 3,216
|
Post by SF07 on Oct 20, 2012 14:50:56 GMT 1
Also 36192-194, all in service with Mauve 42 branding. Yep, pic of 36192 with 42 branding on Ukbus Photos' facebook wall. Here is said pic:
|
|
Steve Macz403
Forum Member
Waits at the bus stop for his bus, 2 days later bus turns up :D
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Steve Macz403 on Oct 20, 2012 16:36:05 GMT 1
Put this in the misallocations page, but i have seen 36257 on 16A. Yeah - saw same yesterday evening (well 16) by Leeds Station. Isn't 16 a Bramley route, or are there some HP workings? 16's supposed to be all Bramley. How it ended up on here is a mystery, maybe covering for fleets. Ive ever seen it with a Bradford B10BLE. Doing cover for the 7's and york road guideds.
|
|
|
Post by Craig on Oct 20, 2012 19:53:47 GMT 1
Why have they put Copley Hill as a destination on the branding? It's a timing point of the service but hardly a key destination. Would Lower Wortley or Oldfield Lane not have been preferable? (Small point I know but sometimes I just don't understand how these decisions get made!)
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Oct 20, 2012 21:02:48 GMT 1
Should most if not all these 12-reg Gemini 2s be in service by October 28th in time for the service changes? Quite a few have already been mentioned or Flickr'd here.
|
|
|
Post by westyorkshirebus on Oct 20, 2012 21:05:51 GMT 1
They are already pretty much all in service now. The service changes doesn't really have anything to do with it.
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Oct 20, 2012 21:15:19 GMT 1
Thanks WYB, I might just come and ride one before the year end now.
|
|
SF07
Forum Member
Posts: 3,216
|
Post by SF07 on Oct 21, 2012 14:07:14 GMT 1
Why have they put Copley Hill as a destination on the branding? It's a timing point of the service but hardly a key destination. Would Lower Wortley or Oldfield Lane not have been preferable? (Small point I know but sometimes I just don't understand how these decisions get made!) First have done some weird things with the route branding. In Bolton, the 36/37 route branding includes Moses Gates, a small area south of Bolton but miss out the much larger and nearby Farnworth, which is also a timing point for the 37 (Moses Gate isn't).
|
|
|
Post by pub146g on Oct 23, 2012 3:10:03 GMT 1
36196/7/8 are further examples to receive Mauve 42 branding.
|
|
|
Post by firstbus05 on Oct 23, 2012 16:17:26 GMT 1
36200 has recieved the 42 mauve line branding aswell
|
|
|
Post by firstbus05 on Nov 8, 2012 22:53:08 GMT 1
36206 has recieved 2, 3, 3A, 12, 13, 13A branding
|
|
Steve Macz403
Forum Member
Waits at the bus stop for his bus, 2 days later bus turns up :D
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Steve Macz403 on Nov 9, 2012 22:45:39 GMT 1
add 36201 too that list of 2/3/12/13 branded ones. Even though it was on an early morning 42
|
|
|
Post by pub146g on Nov 10, 2012 0:19:45 GMT 1
add 36201 too that list of 2/3/12/13 branded ones. Even though it was on an early morning 42 So far 36201-209 have all been branded for Red/Blue line.
|
|
|
Post by firstbus05 on Nov 10, 2012 13:56:57 GMT 1
36213 also has 2 3 3A 12 13 13A branding
|
|
|
Post by chrisboy96 on Nov 10, 2012 21:04:17 GMT 1
36249 has being branded for the brown and blue lines.
|
|
|
Post by fwybuses on Nov 11, 2012 0:32:03 GMT 1
This issue i have with the branding for both "lines" -
Sky does not go near Beeston, the Brown does not go near tinshill nor cookridge.
|
|
stevo
Forum Member
Posts: 72
|
Post by stevo on Nov 11, 2012 11:37:27 GMT 1
This issue i have with the branding for both "lines" - Sky does not go near Beeston, the Brown does not go near tinshill nor cookridge. They interwork on sundays,change numbers when they get to holt park
|
|
|
Post by rst1987 on Nov 11, 2012 14:57:21 GMT 1
36249 has being branded for the brown and blue lines. So has 36251 for 1 & 6. Saw it on service 28 today.
|
|
A1YBG
Forum Member
METRO Here to get you there. Arriva Buses Here to get you there. Arriva need to get original slogans
Posts: 1,935
|
Post by A1YBG on Nov 11, 2012 19:48:50 GMT 1
Will the x84 get a refreshed Branding? As they are not unique with the leather seats.
|
|
|
Post by fwybuses on Nov 11, 2012 20:21:49 GMT 1
This issue i have with the branding for both "lines" - Sky does not go near Beeston, the Brown does not go near tinshill nor cookridge. They interwork on sundays,change numbers when they get to holt park But still does not answer why on earth first are "advertising" brown line as going through tinshill and cookridge! It doesn't. The X84 yes i hope it does, along with the X6. Get them both high profile routes.
|
|
|
Post by biroguy on Nov 11, 2012 21:26:01 GMT 1
To be honest, do passengers know or really care what the branding is! All that information twenty feet above the ground will pass most passengers by! The overground branding seemed like a good idea back in 2001 but as ever with First it pretty much died a death.
|
|
|
Post by chrisboy96 on Nov 17, 2012 15:57:30 GMT 1
36242 and another new Gemini has branding for the 97. First seem to be branding quite a few routes now
|
|
|
Post by pub146g on Nov 17, 2012 17:57:42 GMT 1
There should be 4 getting done for the 97, 36241-244. The red/blues are also still being done in no particular order but eventually 36201-240 should all be red/blue branded.
|
|
|
Post by chrisboy96 on Nov 17, 2012 22:34:21 GMT 1
so most of the new geminis are being branded. wonder if any b7tls( except the 1&6 ones) will get branded?
|
|