joseph
Forum Member
Posts: 1,139
|
Post by joseph on Aug 29, 2023 12:10:24 GMT 1
Ever since Hulleys was taken over by a man called Alf, it's gone from being a well respected LOCAL bus company, to a very disrespected regional sham in my opinion. Yes when he took it over, it had limited ambition and may well have been in financial trouble given the limited services they ran at the time, and the falling passenger numbers using them, but in an over effort to serve everywhere throughout Derbyshire and beyond in the most unusual way possible, it's turned into a proper farce of a company. Take this report into the Breezer service, you couldn't get a more damming report, have a look at one comment about what drivers think about the owner, says a lot. busandtrainuser.com/2023/08/29/an-open-top-bus-bonanza-part-2-1-the-peak-district-breezer/ Why doesn't someone rein this guy in before he destroys the reputation of public transport in the peak district, driver shortages and endless insulting rants about bad parking and unplanned roadworks have been going on for some time now, no wonder the powers that be in Derbyshire Council don't let him know when they're closing a road. I personally have told him straight he was a fool for taking on far too many lengthy routes what clearly would never work in practice, take the X1 linking with the 257 via Manchester as well as the Airport, the 257 itself was bad enough, should only have ran to Glossop with deals done with Northern Rail and Stagecoach for through ticketing to Manchester on the train, and Ashton/Stalybridge (good for accessing walks) on the bus. The Seaside and Alton Towers buses were also asking for trouble, should have been pre-bookable only with only day returns available so nobody is left waiting for a duplicate, or worse still left behind because they can't sort one. Let's not forget the mess local routes themselves are in, Youlegrave residents for example must be wondering which number bus he'll draw out today it's changed that many times!
|
|
|
Post by stephen01 on Dec 4, 2023 23:12:18 GMT 1
Ever since Hulleys was taken over by a man called Alf, it's gone from being a well respected LOCAL bus company, to a very disrespected regional sham in my opinion. Yes when he took it over, it had limited ambition and may well have been in financial trouble given the limited services they ran at the time, and the falling passenger numbers using them, but in an over effort to serve everywhere throughout Derbyshire and beyond in the most unusual way possible, it's turned into a proper farce of a company. Take this report into the Breezer service, you couldn't get a more damming report, have a look at one comment about what drivers think about the owner, says a lot. busandtrainuser.com/2023/08/29/an-open-top-bus-bonanza-part-2-1-the-peak-district-breezer/ Why doesn't someone rein this guy in before he destroys the reputation of public transport in the peak district, driver shortages and endless insulting rants about bad parking and unplanned roadworks have been going on for some time now, no wonder the powers that be in Derbyshire Council don't let him know when they're closing a road. I personally have told him straight he was a fool for taking on far too many lengthy routes what clearly would never work in practice, take the X1 linking with the 257 via Manchester as well as the Airport, the 257 itself was bad enough, should only have ran to Glossop with deals done with Northern Rail and Stagecoach for through ticketing to Manchester on the train, and Ashton/Stalybridge (good for accessing walks) on the bus. The Seaside and Alton Towers buses were also asking for trouble, should have been pre-bookable only with only day returns available so nobody is left waiting for a duplicate, or worse still left behind because they can't sort one. Let's not forget the mess local routes themselves are in, Youlegrave residents for example must be wondering which number bus he'll draw out today it's changed that many times! well it's been announced today they are taking over Kent based Go-Coach. /?app=fbl
|
|
|
Post by smithy on Dec 5, 2023 16:12:16 GMT 1
Seen a go coach in Sheffield today running a service
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2023 16:16:18 GMT 1
Seen a go coach in Sheffield today running a service They've loaned/bought a few Go-Coach vehicles over the past year or so, including an Optare Solo (now repainted), a Solo SR, Versa & a couple of E400s
|
|
joseph
Forum Member
Posts: 1,139
|
Post by joseph on Dec 5, 2023 17:48:25 GMT 1
Just when you think things have settled a bit and Alf has cut back on silly decisions he goes on to do this! We now know though that this guy is loaded hence why Hulleys didn't fold sooner, unless it turns out he's sold Hulleys? Personally, I'd ditch the Hulleys side and just concentrate on Go Coach as Hulleys reputation with the public isn't that great nowadays. It's a firm that should just concentrate on tendered services, nothing else, leave the rest for DCC to either fund or for other firms to cover.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2023 18:26:56 GMT 1
Just when you think things have settled a bit and Alf has cut back on silly decisions he goes on to do this! We now know though that this guy is loaded hence why Hulleys didn't fold sooner, unless it turns out he's sold Hulleys? Personally, I'd ditch the Hulleys side and just concentrate on Go Coach as Hulleys reputation with the public isn't that great nowadays. It's a firm that should just concentrate on tendered services, nothing else, leave the rest for DCC to either fund or for other firms to cover. Isn't the 170 & 271/2 the only remaining commercial routes? Everything else seems to have some sort of DCC funding so I'm not sure what your point is as I'd bet those 2 routes carry more than the rest of the network combined. From my last couple of trips to the area their driver shortage seems to have calmed down so there's nothing really to achieve by getting rid of remaining commercial routes.
|
|
|
Post by kayden11 on Dec 6, 2023 15:55:19 GMT 1
Yeah I can't fault them.for trying the weird and wacky routes, however at least they had the decency to withdraw them and nit carry on muddling through and knocking services, besides the late evening 257 are withdrawn due to staffing issues, maybe buying another company may bring other resources to operate dcc routes when they get up.to.staffing levels,
|
|
joseph
Forum Member
Posts: 1,139
|
Post by joseph on Dec 6, 2023 17:02:54 GMT 1
I'm sure the 172 is partly commercial, so too will many Summer journeys such as those on the 173, 275 etc, but the point I'm getting at is everything settled down, or so I thought, after the farce of the Breezer service was which was a joke from the start, how the hell did he expect to get away with a timetable that broke the speed limit! So, like I say all seemed to settle down a bit, then he goes and buys a firm miles from Derbyshire, what will he do, helicopter drivers between both counties? He's better off just concentrating on one firm. As for the decency to withdraw routes, the X1 only ran for 1 day and resulted in a number of amended routes that were amended so as not to be in competition with this commercial venture having to be re-amended to cover the areas left without a service! The words flaiming clot spring to mind when it comes to a farce like that!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2023 18:15:36 GMT 1
I'm sure the 172 is partly commercial, so too will many Summer journeys such as those on the 173, 275 etc, but the point I'm getting at is everything settled down, or so I thought, after the farce of the Breezer service was which was a joke from the start, how the hell did he expect to get away with a timetable that broke the speed limit! So, like I say all seemed to settle down a bit, then he goes and buys a firm miles from Derbyshire, what will he do, helicopter drivers between both counties? He's better off just concentrating on one firm. As for the decency to withdraw routes, the X1 only ran for 1 day and resulted in a number of amended routes that were amended so as not to be in competition with this commercial venture having to be re-amended to cover the areas left without a service! The words flaiming clot spring to mind when it comes to a farce like that! GoCoach are a firm with a good reputation, fairly modern fleet & turns over an OK profit considering the areas it runs in, from a business point of view surely that ticks all the boxes of a good company to make a bid for. Whilst it's not happened for a few years, it's not the first time a independent has bought another outside of it's original operating area with previous examples having mixed results ( Rotala expanding into West Mids v Centrebus into West Yorkshire for example). At the moment things seem to be improving so I'm hopeful this takeover will have positive results.
|
|
joseph
Forum Member
Posts: 1,139
|
Post by joseph on Dec 13, 2023 7:20:53 GMT 1
Things down at Hulleys aren't going well by a long way, 41 journeys cancelled yesterday throughout most of it's network with the blame laid on multiple issues, this really is not good enough. Yes the bigger companies have similar issues but this is the prime reason why Hulleys need to reign it in and be more realistic with what they can reliably do. They are too wide spread, too thin on the ground, doing way too much for the resources they realistically have. Do you see Squarepeg having such issues? Hulleys must scale back to how they used to be before the takeover and if that's not commercially viable, or can be covered by Derbyshire Council leading to closure, then that's better than running into the ground with a big network, no customers, massive losses and finally closure with a big debt.
|
|
|
Post by SCH117X on Dec 18, 2023 23:30:14 GMT 1
They seem to have embarked on some weird fleet renumbering presuambly based on that used by Go Coach.
3619 for Solar SR YK05CA0 - Go Coach have 2801, 3801, 3802, 3901, 3902 6311 and 6323 for two Enviro 200s - Go Coach have Enviro 200 MMCs 8343-8347
|
|
|
Post by stephen01 on Dec 19, 2023 0:41:28 GMT 1
They seem to have embarked on some weird fleet renumbering presuambly based on that used by Go Coach. 3619 for Solar SR YK05CA0 - Go Coach have 2801, 3801, 3802, 3901, 3902 6311 and 6323 for two Enviro 200s - Go Coach have Enviro 200 MMCs 8343-8347 YK05 CAO is a standard (or classic) Solo design. So with the fleetnumbering been adapted the first 2 digits are the seating capacity and the other two are supposed to be what number it is currently is in the current Hulley's fleet numbers.
|
|
|
Post by steve440 on Dec 19, 2023 18:15:29 GMT 1
They seem to have embarked on some weird fleet renumbering presuambly based on that used by Go Coach. 3619 for Solar SR YK05CA0 - Go Coach have 2801, 3801, 3802, 3901, 3902 6311 and 6323 for two Enviro 200s - Go Coach have Enviro 200 MMCs 8343-8347 Well at least that should help with service delivery then!!!
|
|
i901
Forum Member
Posts: 57
|
Post by i901 on Dec 19, 2023 20:10:07 GMT 1
They seem to have embarked on some weird fleet renumbering presuambly based on that used by Go Coach. 3619 for Solar SR YK05CA0 - Go Coach have 2801, 3801, 3802, 3901, 3902 6311 and 6323 for two Enviro 200s - Go Coach have Enviro 200 MMCs 8343-8347 First 2 digits are the total capacity (standing + seated), second 2 digits are the (former) Hulleys fleet number. So 3619 = capacity of 36, was Hulleys no 19. I'm sure all the folk stood at bus stops in the middle of nowhere freezing their bits off because Hulleys have failed to show will appreciate the new fleet number stickers that have been applied...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2023 16:48:31 GMT 1
|
|
joseph
Forum Member
Posts: 1,139
|
Post by joseph on Dec 22, 2023 20:59:26 GMT 1
It's a start but if they'd have apologised for things like getting the X1 farce totally wrong, the timetable for the Breezer totally wrong and so on then their reputation may not have been as damaged.
|
|
deerfold
Forum Member
Posts: 2,368
Member is Online
|
Post by deerfold on Dec 22, 2023 21:32:25 GMT 1
But still had several cancellations today.
|
|
|
Post by stephen01 on Dec 22, 2023 23:40:52 GMT 1
But still had several cancellations today. the first effects of the fleet & reliability solutions until w.c 08th January 2024 to give it chance to settle down fully.
|
|
|
Post by stephen01 on Dec 22, 2023 23:54:03 GMT 1
It's a start but if they'd have apologised for things like getting the X1 farce totally wrong, the timetable for the Breezer totally wrong and so on then their reputation may not have been as damaged. true but it seems to be covered cloakly in most of the apology (more of rant really). But if they are standardising both fleets it'll mean the 2 EvoRas will soon be leaving then surely as all the Go-Coach fleet consists e200s, e400s, e200MMCs, Solos, Solo SRs, Versas & Tempos..
|
|
i901
Forum Member
Posts: 57
|
Post by i901 on Mar 12, 2024 21:50:51 GMT 1
Hulley back to their usual tricks... register a new service (X10 Sheffield to Alton Towers), get the relevant local authorities to go to the trouble of producing timetables etc, then pull the service just before it is due to start...
|
|
joseph
Forum Member
Posts: 1,139
|
Post by joseph on Mar 17, 2024 21:59:22 GMT 1
The latest failure is service 80, a long route that everyone said wouldn't work and it hasn't as it's to be withdrawn beyond Hollymoorside soon. Roadworks, unforseen (yer right) driver shortages and broken buses are to blame, not stretching themselves way too far once again. Rather than taking a service on just because a council asks nicely, I think they need to cut back! The Sunday 257 springs to mind, this should be cut back to Glossop as the current Sunday workings to Castleton via everywhere is asking for trouble.
|
|