|
Post by Dom on Apr 10, 2015 15:30:18 GMT 1
Volvo B7tl Gemini 37038 is the first to be debranded.
It should soon feature a new High Frequency logo. Although won't be branded for a route.
|
|
|
Post by andyk4050 on Apr 10, 2015 15:42:06 GMT 1
36199 has been debranded also
|
|
|
Post by rst1987 on Apr 10, 2015 16:30:47 GMT 1
So has 37044.
|
|
39231
Forum Member
Posts: 547
|
Post by 39231 on Apr 10, 2015 17:36:46 GMT 1
36241 has lost 97 branding
|
|
39231
Forum Member
Posts: 547
|
Post by 39231 on Apr 10, 2015 17:55:10 GMT 1
Also 36227 has lost its branding
|
|
39231
Forum Member
Posts: 547
|
Post by 39231 on Apr 10, 2015 18:10:17 GMT 1
36185 as well
|
|
Steve Macz403
Forum Member
Waits at the bus stop for his bus, 2 days later bus turns up :D
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Steve Macz403 on Apr 10, 2015 22:44:16 GMT 1
that will make bus allocations interesting, but then again it means Hunslet park can work any of its 12 reg gemini's (Except 36276-78) on any route , without it being a recorded misallocation anymore. Means our spotted board will become less populated lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2015 23:50:21 GMT 1
I didn't like the current branding anyway, the text was so small compared to the older style as I bet hardly anyone would even read such small print. Plus notably some red/blue line branded Geminis have missing bits of branding due to replaced windows, another reason why I liked the older style brandings as it was mainly above or below the windows. But after this about high frequency stickers however, Stagecoach in Hull's Frequento springs to mind.
Michael Windle
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 0:17:29 GMT 1
I didn't like the current branding anyway, the text was so small compared to the older style as I bet hardly anyone would even read such small print. Plus notably some red/blue line branded Geminis have missing bits of branding due to replaced windows, another reason why I liked the older style brandings as it was mainly above or below the windows. But after this about high frequency stickers however, Stagecoach in Hull's Frequento springs to mind. Michael Windle Probably be something similar to glasgow`s Simplicity ,i wounder if Bradford will get something similar as they only have 2 branded routes
|
|
39231
Forum Member
Posts: 547
|
Post by 39231 on Apr 11, 2015 12:09:50 GMT 1
37060 is the next one to lose branding
|
|
|
Post by biroguy on Apr 11, 2015 13:16:30 GMT 1
Maybe we should ditch the branding altogether and just paint the buses in a unique livery for each area.
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Apr 11, 2015 13:40:07 GMT 1
37060 has lost its route branding
|
|
|
Post by timelesstable on Apr 11, 2015 18:18:45 GMT 1
The new High Frequency logos are due to be applied over the week-end 26/27th April.
I understand it (high frequency logo) will be applied to all those which had previously carried route branding.
|
|
|
Post by biroguy on Apr 11, 2015 23:06:33 GMT 1
First really struggle with branding, always half baked. Since 2001 we`ve had the Overground, Turn up and go, Superbus, elite, ftr, HyperLink, Super Sevens. In theory good ideas but sadly there is never the will to see it through with First and the whole thing falls apart. I wonder what brand we`ll be treated to next. Let`s just paint the Leeds fleet green and have done with it
|
|
|
Post by MetrolineGA1511 on Apr 11, 2015 23:08:58 GMT 1
In a way this is good. The High Frequency logo could inspire confidence. I never really like insignia over the windows, as it doesn't look good outside and makes it harder inside looking out.
|
|
39231
Forum Member
Posts: 547
|
Post by 39231 on Apr 12, 2015 15:07:12 GMT 1
36231 lost its branding now
|
|
39231
Forum Member
Posts: 547
|
Post by 39231 on Apr 12, 2015 15:07:50 GMT 1
37060 has lost its route branding Already put that one up
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Apr 12, 2015 18:23:14 GMT 1
I got a question I am just wondering will the 72 keep its hyperlink route branding with other high frequency leeds buses geeting debranded.
|
|
|
Post by Arriva Wakefield on Apr 12, 2015 18:49:52 GMT 1
Perhaps there's a network / working revision planned for the future, and this is the preperation for it.
Wouldn't surprise me if they started interworking more services, such as
1 / 6 at Holt Park 6 / 33 / 97 at Leeds City Bus station 4 / 56 at Whinmoor
|
|
|
Post by Dom on Apr 12, 2015 19:35:32 GMT 1
Perhaps there's a network / working revision planned for the future, and this is the preperation for it. Wouldn't surprise me if they started interworking more services, such as 1 / 6 at Holt Park 6 / 33 / 97 at Leeds City Bus station 4 / 56 at Whinmoor From what I have been told from a source, Senior Management at Leeds have been disappointed with the allocation of buses, not necessarily by the allocator, but more engineers who put any bus out if they need a swap. Usually on a morning, it can be difficult to get the right bus out on the right route because of positions of the bus, it was a decision soly made by Senior Management and I believe there are no plans to interior other services as yet. 1/6 can't interwork because of attics 6/28/97 can't interwork because the 28 trips start from Adel and it would increase PVR 4/56 can't interwork as the 4 terminates at Seacroft, and the 16 is the Whinmoor bus, linking them would mean that they won't have enough buses equipped for the guided bus way. As both routes are too long and have different frequency intervals.
|
|
|
Post by 576 Gemini 2 on Apr 12, 2015 19:38:24 GMT 1
First really struggle with branding, always half baked. Since 2001 we`ve had the Overground, Turn up and go, Superbus, elite, ftr, HyperLink, Super Sevens. In theory good ideas but sadly there is never the will to see it through with First and the whole thing falls apart. I wonder what brand we`ll be treated to next. Let`s just paint the Leeds fleet green and have done with it Sovereign in Bradford, Gold Service & Quality Service in Calderdale
|
|
|
Post by Dom on Apr 12, 2015 23:47:23 GMT 1
Clarence Dock not Adel, aplogise
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Apr 14, 2015 17:42:23 GMT 1
36187 has now been debranded
|
|
|
Post by rst1987 on Apr 14, 2015 22:24:29 GMT 1
36250 also debranded.
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Apr 15, 2015 10:55:38 GMT 1
36258 now debranded
|
|