Jack
Forum Member
Posts: 1,244
|
Post by Jack on May 7, 2009 17:11:50 GMT 1
37021-24 have now moved onto Hunslet Park from Cherry Row. So that explains why more ALX400s are being used on the 51/51A and 42.
Info from YDBN.
|
|
|
|
Post by nick on May 7, 2009 18:13:53 GMT 1
Nice to see B7TL back at Hunslet Park. Will make a pleasent journey on the X84 to Skipton.
|
|
kendall17
Forum Member
Justice for the 96!
Posts: 4,515
|
Post by kendall17 on May 7, 2009 18:25:58 GMT 1
Why did Hunslet pass on so many Royales/RHs to Bramley if they now require Geminis from C.Row? Why didn't Cherry Row pass Alx400s to Hunslet instead?
|
|
|
|
Post by nick on May 8, 2009 16:28:58 GMT 1
Are cherry row borrowing B9TL from Hunslet park or is it one of the non branded 56 ones that has just escaped onto the 51/51A route today?
|
|
|
|
Post by westyorkshirebus on May 31, 2009 18:57:23 GMT 1
Did Cherry Row receive anything to replace these 4 Geminis?
I've got Cherry Row's allocation as 108 buses, which isn't that much higher than the PVR of around 100
|
|
puggy
Forum Member
Posts: 350
|
Post by puggy on Jun 1, 2009 20:37:47 GMT 1
Bradford have put new B9's into service among those I noticed -
37704 on the 635
37705 on the 640
37720 on the 610
37719 on the 614
I don't know which buses other than the 06 Geminis have been replaced by these buses
|
|
|
|
Post by northerner on Jun 1, 2009 20:54:43 GMT 1
I saw 37729 on the 610 and 37731 on the 614 this afternoon. Has it been confirmed how many Bradford are getting?
|
|
|
|
Post by 576 Gemini 2 on Jun 2, 2009 19:22:29 GMT 1
Bradford have put new B9's into service among those I noticed - 37704 on the 635 37705 on the 640 37720 on the 610 37719 on the 614 I don't know which buses other than the 06 Geminis have been replaced by these buses Service 635 does not exist |
|
|
|
Post by hfx on Jun 3, 2009 0:25:09 GMT 1
It might be a typo error, as it could be 636/637.
|
|
puggy
Forum Member
Posts: 350
|
Post by puggy on Jun 3, 2009 7:35:51 GMT 1
Sorry meant the 636
|
|
Steve Macz403
Forum Member
Waits at the bus stop for his bus, 2 days later bus turns up :D
Posts: 1,679
|
Post by Steve Macz403 on Jun 15, 2009 17:29:29 GMT 1
Why are the new gemini numbers split so badly?  it seems weird for bradford to have 37704-37709 then 19/20 and 29. With new 37710-37718 , 37724, 37725, 37727(spotted today) and 37728 at Leeds, should they sort it out and allocate the batch numbers fairly at least.  |
|
|
|
Post by hfx on Jun 15, 2009 21:07:24 GMT 1
They certainly need to sort out the B7RLE 66738 - 66792 allocations split between Halifax & Hudds.
|
|
|
|
Post by firstbusmaniacrich on Jun 16, 2009 11:58:09 GMT 1
just like the splits in our darts from essex with some in halifax from the geminis on hardly ever being needed for the 370.
|
|
|
|
Post by driver6540 on Jun 19, 2009 19:09:53 GMT 1
just a quick question folks 66792 was the last B7RLE of the batch delivered in 05 to FWY and 66794 was the first of its batch to be delivered to first manchester the same year i was just wondering if 66793 exists and if it does where? i have not seen it on any first fleetlist thanks!
|
|
Matty
Forum Member
Posts: 5,615
|
Post by Matty on Jun 19, 2009 19:31:08 GMT 1
2 new Eclipse's was seen in Bradford today with 123 Hanover Displays on the Desti and plastic over the seats.
|
|
|
|
Post by hfx on Jun 19, 2009 21:21:11 GMT 1
just a quick question folks 66792 was the last B7RLE of the batch delivered in 05 to FWY and 66794 was the first of its batch to be delivered to first manchester the same year i was just wondering if 66793 exists and if it does where? i have not seen it on any first fleetlist thanks! A good Question, I've also been wondering what happened to this bus. I don't think 66793 exists in any other fleet. I can only think, that it was either re-numbered and passed to another First Division or this was in fact a total muddle up from First HQ with 55 actually meant to be on order (?) |
|
it seems weird for bradford to have 37704-37709 then 19/20 and 29. With new 37710-37718 , 37724, 37725, 37727(spotted today) and 37728 at Leeds, should they sort it out and allocate the batch numbers fairly at least. 
