69340
Forum Member
Posts: 463
|
Post by 69340 on Jan 10, 2016 2:39:11 GMT 1
787 on 59 yesterday
|
|
69340
Forum Member
Posts: 463
|
Post by 69340 on Jan 10, 2016 20:39:01 GMT 1
36276 on X99
|
|
37057
Forum Member
Posts: 869
|
Post by 37057 on Jan 11, 2016 12:51:52 GMT 1
Alx400 30926 on X84
|
|
WYBS
Forum Member
Watch-o
Posts: 1,516
|
Post by WYBS on Jan 11, 2016 17:32:07 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by 576 Gemini 2 on Jan 11, 2016 17:35:10 GMT 1
Sparrow Recovery Volvo tow truck was dealing with 19016 in Bradford Interchange while the ambulance service were dealing with an illness/injury on Ladies Only"s R444 LOT at the same time
|
|
|
Post by sharksmith on Jan 11, 2016 18:07:36 GMT 1
I do find all this schoolyard stuff awfully tedious, are Connexions really suggesting they own this stretch of road. K&D have created new links between Keighley, Silsden & Addingham to Harrogate. Hardly an imitation, it's not as if H&D are duplicating the route only as far as Ilkley. The response by Connexions, remove Guiseley's link with Harrogate. You don't see First spitting the dummy at the competition between Addingham and Otley. I don't pretend to fully follow this whole silly feud but surely it must be time for Connexions to just concentrate on their own company.
|
|
|
Post by westyorkshirebus on Jan 11, 2016 18:42:39 GMT 1
Have you seen the post on their website about the X52/X53?
Service X52 changes from 18th January
Transdev have announced that they are to operate a service from Harrogate to Ilkley from January. In order to protect our business from this predatory move by a much larger multinational operator, we have been forced to change our times.
We ask that you continue to support your locally owned family run company, and not the other foreign owned business.
|
|
|
Post by sharksmith on Jan 11, 2016 18:48:19 GMT 1
Have you seen the post on their website about the X52/X53? Are all these 'novelty' destination displays allowed under DDA rules? Hope so as it would be very silly to publicise breaches of the rules on your own website.
|
|
WYBS
Forum Member
Watch-o
Posts: 1,516
|
Post by WYBS on Jan 11, 2016 19:38:50 GMT 1
It seems as though they're angry about Keighley's bus being 10 minutes in front of their's. What can you say? I personally prefer Keighley & D, they generally have top quality vehicles with good drivers.
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Jan 11, 2016 21:04:15 GMT 1
First Manchester 37402 has been on the 51 this Morning then on the 1 this Afternoon
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Jan 11, 2016 21:04:50 GMT 1
And also 66788 has been on the 6 & 97 today
|
|
|
Post by shedman on Jan 12, 2016 1:35:33 GMT 1
I do find all this schoolyard stuff awfully tedious, are Connexions really suggesting they own this stretch of road. K&D have created new links between Keighley, Silsden & Addingham to Harrogate. Hardly an imitation, it's not as if H&D are duplicating the route only as far as Ilkley. The response by Connexions, remove Guiseley's link with Harrogate. You don't see First spitting the dummy at the competition between Addingham and Otley. I don't pretend to fully follow this whole silly feud but surely it must be time for Connexions to just concentrate on their own company. It's called business. You have to do what you have to do to protect that and even though it can be seen as a little inappropriate it's certainly getting the point across. They will struggle to compete especially with transdev offering the day tickets covering all companies (if I read it right?) which opens up a whole host of extra journies to folk. As for first, why would such a large operator care about a small independent in not a particularly large area? I would guess the main market would be to Leeds which first have. Anyway we digress from the actual topic so apologies
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Jan 12, 2016 22:01:58 GMT 1
FWY 69335 on the 1 today & 37660 on the 51/52 today
|
|
|
Post by whereami on Jan 13, 2016 11:24:16 GMT 1
AY MAX livery and 229 Branding 1538 on 220/221/222 group of services. Also 1548 in MAX livery and branding on 229
|
|
|
Post by Burnside on Jan 13, 2016 18:47:02 GMT 1
It seems as though they're angry about Keighley's bus being 10 minutes in front of their's. What can you say? I personally prefer Keighley & D, they generally have top quality vehicles with good drivers. Transdev drivers are good but i've never had an issue with Connexions either. As for vehicles, Connexions generally use a 56 reg Scania Omnicity whereas the last couple of days Transdev have had a Y reg B10BLE on the Harrogate run. As good as these buses are for their age, i'd take the Scania. Most normal passengers will just board whichever comes first, hence Connexions altering their times. No business would just stand back and let a competitor rock up and take over.
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Jan 13, 2016 21:49:41 GMT 1
FWY 32439 & 39230 were on the 51/52 today also 69414 is on the 1 this evening
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Jan 14, 2016 9:48:51 GMT 1
FWY 37735 is on the 28 this morning
|
|
|
Post by jamesmckenna1993 on Jan 14, 2016 10:08:20 GMT 1
FWY 39228 on the 51 & 52
|
|
|
Post by whereami on Jan 14, 2016 10:20:24 GMT 1
UID 281/2/3 branded Pulsar on 202/3
|
|
|
Post by yr5224 on Jan 14, 2016 18:24:09 GMT 1
66768 on 74
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2016 20:16:40 GMT 1
Tiger Blue Cadet 625(KIG 7305) back on its former haunt of Route 232 at about teatime.
|
|
|
Post by clifton on Jan 14, 2016 22:49:48 GMT 1
1547 Max (229 branded) on 256 1523 Max spare on 220 1524 on 229
|
|
|
Post by adam on Jan 15, 2016 9:23:08 GMT 1
1541 with 229 max branding on 685 Woodkirk School to Thorpe yesterday afternoon Sapphire on the 1st Leeds to Wakefield 117 this morning and presumably the 0510 Wakefield to Leeds 117
|
|
37057
Forum Member
Posts: 869
|
Post by 37057 on Jan 15, 2016 15:03:32 GMT 1
30931 on X14 gears slipping 30892 on 714 37098 broke down leeds rd on x6
|
|
|
Post by rst1987 on Jan 15, 2016 15:47:38 GMT 1
On loan to Hunslet is Bramley's 32439 on 33
|
|