|
Post by striderlad on Nov 3, 2009 3:56:57 GMT 1
why has 61134 gone bk 2 its old reg
|
|
kendall17
Forum Member
Justice for the 96!
Posts: 4,515
|
Post by kendall17 on Nov 3, 2009 9:51:49 GMT 1
why has 61134 gone bk 2 its old reg Probably becuase First want to keep the reg 8995 WY like they have done with K1 YRL.
|
|
|
Post by striderlad on Nov 3, 2009 11:27:12 GMT 1
so were is 8656 61134 going then?? if it was going 4 scrap they wudnt put regs bk on it
|
|
|
Post by sharksmith on Nov 3, 2009 15:03:43 GMT 1
I believe one or two of the RH Alexanders have been moved to Bradford also. 31818 is currently being prepared for transfer to Bradford and should be going early this week. Did this bus go back to Leeds as I took a photo of it running the Bradford depot shuttle bus on 2 October, see earlier post?
|
|
kendall17
Forum Member
Justice for the 96!
Posts: 4,515
|
Post by kendall17 on Nov 3, 2009 16:05:11 GMT 1
so were is 8656 61134 going then?? if it was going 4 scrap they wudnt put regs bk on it They probably had to put the reg back on for transfer between Cherry Row & Bramley. Although i hope this bus has a purpose at Cherry Row.
|
|
|
Post by striderlad on Nov 3, 2009 22:55:40 GMT 1
if it was just transfering it they wud have put trade plates i think x
|
|
kendall17
Forum Member
Justice for the 96!
Posts: 4,515
|
Post by kendall17 on Nov 4, 2009 5:46:19 GMT 1
if it was just transfering it they wud have put trade plates i think x trade plates are for tax purposes only iirc?
|
|
|
Post by Craig on Nov 4, 2009 19:30:06 GMT 1
I presume First have changed the registration of the vehicle and therefore would be obliged to display the correct updated plates.
|
|