|
|
Post by northerner on Mar 5, 2010 23:16:30 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by B521UWW on Mar 6, 2010 0:16:40 GMT 1
This should be linked to pay, the 500 litres should equate to about £500 - the drivers that save that much should be rewarded with at least 5o% of that amount!
|
|
|
|
Post by northerner on Mar 6, 2010 0:18:50 GMT 1
Thought they were financial rewards for drivers?
|
|
|
|
Post by firstinsider on Mar 7, 2010 0:58:17 GMT 1
In Bradford the driver with the best score each week receives £50
and the runner up £40.
Also the most improved driver receives £50 and the runner up £40.
Just to note the driver who won it 4 weeks ago is still waiting to be paid.
In reality it has nothing to do with the environment and saving on CO2'S.It is all about trying to make drives drive so slow as to eliminate all the compensation claims that are brought against the company each week,through the "com pen say shun" culture that blights Gordon Browns stay at home Britten of today.
|
|
|
|
Post by billycarne on Mar 11, 2010 12:31:28 GMT 1
driving too slow is as and if not more dangerous as driving "too" fast.
|
|
|
|
Post by rwilkes on Mar 11, 2010 21:30:03 GMT 1
Firstinsider wrote: "In reality it has nothing to do with the environment and saving on CO2'S.It is all about trying to make drives drive so slow as to eliminate all the compensation claims that are brought against the company each week,through the "com pen say shun" culture that blights Gordon Browns stay at home Britten of today. "
This is too cynical a view. Like IAM-Fleet, DriveGreen cuts fuel bills, maintenance costs and scrapes/crashes - and hence insurance costs. Anything that cuts fuel bill also cuts carbon emissions and it would be dumb not to get some PR out of this.
It s pity First do not trumpet the fact that most of their new buses have cat-afterburnes which cut pollution.
|
|
